Article Information
Corresponding author : Nykytyuk Svitlana

Article Type : Research Article

Volume : 4

Issue : 16

Received Date : 02 Jul ,2023


Accepted Date : 31 Aug ,2023

Published Date : 05 Sep ,2023


DOI : https://doi.org/10.38207/JMCRCS/2023/SEP041604112
Citation & Copyright
Citation: Svitlana N, larysa M, Lilya M, Olena S (2023) Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome in A Child: Clinical Case Report. J Med Case Rep Case Series 4(16): https://doi.org/10.38207/JMCRCS/2023/SEP041604112

Copyright: © 2023 Nykytyuk Svitlana. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credi
  Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome in A Child: Clinical Case Report

Nykytyuk Svitlana*, Martynyuk larysa, Martynyuk Lilya, Stelmakh Olena

Horbachevsky Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine

*Corresponding Author: Nykytyuk Svitlana, Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine.

Abstract
Introduction
:
Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is one of the most common causes of acute kidney injury in children and is defined by the simultaneous occurrence of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia when the small blood vessels in kidneys become damaged and inflamed.

Case presentationA clinical case of post-diarrheal HUS in an 8-month-old child complicated by acute kidney injury. The analysis of the literary data from Medscape and Pubmed was carried out. During the examination, the diagnosis was specified. Postdiarrheal HUS. Acute renal failure, oligoanuria stage. Upon admission, the child's condition was severe, caused by impaired kidney function and, as a result, intoxication. The treatment was effective, and the patient's condition improved during the hospitalization period, although establishing the diagnosis required the cooperation of doctors of many specialties and many additional examinations.

Conclusions: This clinical case is a classic, "textbook" example of hemolytic-uremic syndrome in children, which is indicated by the presence of both a typical anamnesis (a clear connection with a previous infection) and a typical clinical picture ("triad"). There is a need to increase knowledge about this pathology among general practitioners and district pediatricians since managing patients with typical HUS in pediatrics requires a complex and multidisciplinary approach.

Keywords: hemolytic uremic syndrome, children, renal failure, acute kidney injury, AkI, Shiga toxin, Escherichia coli.

Introduction
Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is one of the most common causes of acute kidney injury in children. In Europe, the age category from 6 months up to 5 years is the most vulnerable [1]. The long-term consequences of this disease suffered in childhood are still being investigated. There is evidence that these children have a higher risk of developing CKD in adulthood, which correlates with the duration of the oligouric phase [2]. According to M.I. Burakovsky, the mortality rate in the USA and Western European countries is about 5- 7%, and the same number of children have serious consequences (CKD, hemorrhages, hypertensive disorders) [3]. Therefore, such patients require long-term observation and are often lost from the medical workers' field of view, making the study of pathology even more difficult [4,5].

The problem is in the difficulty of predicting the development of this syndrome: there are no reliable predictors for post-diarrheal HUS, and in the case of atypical, although a connection with heredity has been found, there is still a whole range of possible genetic markers, so their determination is not a routine test and is possible only in specialized laboratories [6].

Establishing a diagnosis facilitates the choice of patient management tactics and improves the overall prognosis. Even though the forecast for HUS is generally favorable, there are still many unexplored problems, such as the probability of developing remote complications, the search for predictors, and the means of prevention.

Case Presentation
An 8-month-old child was admitted with complaints of decreased rate of diuresis, red color of urine, and discomfort during urination. According to the patient's mother's information, the child fell ill on 06.07.2021 when mushy stools appeared after eating fresh greens. There was no increased body temperature. He was treated on an outpatient basis (enterosorbents, diet). On 06.17.2021, multiple liquid stools and refused to eat, which the mother associates with introducing milk mixture into the diet. He was hospitalized at his residence (Kramatorsk) and received treatment - antibiotic therapy and infusion therapy. On 06.19.2021, the pink color of the urine appeared, and the child began to strain when urinating. On 06.20.2021, he was transferred to the intensive care unit, and later, on 06.21.2021, he was again transferred to the intensive care unit in the hospital of Sloviansk. During the treatment, increased azotemia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and a decrease in the rate of diuresis, proteinuria, and microhematuria were observed. HUS and AKI are suspected. The child was transferred to Kyiv Children's Regional Hospital. He was discharged after treatment on the 15 days. Currently, he is under the observation of a hematologist in the oncology and hematology department of the Ternopil Regional Children's Clinical Hospital.

Anamnesis Vitae: The child is from 3rd pregnancy, 2nd childbirth. The pregnancy was uneventful; the labor was physiological. The child was born with a body weight of 3180 g, height of 56 cm, and 8.9 on the Apgar scale and vaccinated according to the calendar. There were no injuries or operations. Hereditary anamnesis is not burdensome. Allergological anamnesis is not overbearing.

Objective status upon admission: The general condition of the child is severe due to intoxication syndrome, oliguria, hyperazotemia, and anemia. The child is conscious, lethargic, and reacts to the examination by crying.

The skin is pale pink, warm, moist. The face is pasty; the limbs are swollen. T 36.8℃, BM – 10.4 kg. Respiratory rate - 38. min. During auscultation, it's puerile over the entire surface of the lungs without wheezing—SpO2 97-98%.

The tones of the heart are muffled and rhythmic. Heart rate – 117. min, blood pressure – 139.79 mmHg. Capillary filling - 2 s.

No neurological deficit was detected at the time of examination. Pupils D=S, photoreaction preserved.

The abdomen is soft, symmetrical, distended, and accessible to deep palpation. Auscultatively - the noise of peristalsis. There are traces of pink urine in the diaper. There are no stools at the time of inspection. The complete blood count revealed leukocytosis with a shift of the leukoformula to the left, which was observed only in the first days after admission, moderate anemia and thrombocytopenia, which persisted for about a week, increased ESR and reticulocytosis (Table 1). In the biochemical analysis of blood, a significant increase in urea and creatinine is noticeable, which indicates impaired kidney function (Table 2). The coagulogram showed hypofibrinogenemia and a slight rise in APTT, which were successfully corrected during treatment (Table 3).

Among the changes in urinalysis - macrohematuria and massive proteinuria (Table 4).

No changes were detected during instrumental examination and specific laboratory tests (Table 5-6).

Table 1. Complete blood count in dynamics.

Paramether.date

26.06

29.06

01.07

03.07

07.07

11.07

13.07

19.07

21.07

27.07

WBC*109.L

10,1

7,3

7,3

3,9

7,7

7,9

6,3

11,8

9,4

10,24

Hb g/l

83

74

123

67

97

128

130

125

132

145

RBC *1012.L

2,91

2,49

4,08

2,31

3,55

4,54

4,70

4,36

4,85

5,03

PLT 109.l

87

34

183

41

115

231

215

579

682

466

Bands %

12

9

12

5

7

30

7

3

5

2

Segmented

neutrophils %

39

33

39

40

63

57

48

57

57

25

Lymph %

39

45

31

34

17

12

23

13

15

29

Мonocytes %

10

9

16

14

9

1

7

7

9

8

Eosinophil %

0

4

2

6

3

0

7

20

13

 

Basophil %

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reticulocytes %

14,9

8,2

6,7

 

4,7

 

1,6

 

 

 

ESR мм. hours

20

25

12

36

21

11

9

11

16

 

Table 2. Biochemical profile in dynamics.

Parameter

26.06

28.06

01.07

03.07

05.07

08.07

10.07

12.07

14.07

27.07

Referent norm

ALT

25

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

Before 39

АST

80

 

45

 

 

 

 

 

 

18

before

Amylase.U.l

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

28-100

Total bilirubin mmol.l

18,4

19,7

19

17,7

19,5

6,0

15,0

7,7

9,2

5,0

17,0

Conjugated bilirubin

4,0

2,1

6,1

5,6

6,5

3,2

5,6

3,5

3,3

1,0

 

Unconjugated bilirubin

14,4

17,6

12,9

11,1

13,0

2,8

9,4

4,2

5,9

4,0

 

Na

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,1

К

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

128,5

Ca

1,98

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cl

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

P

2,0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fe

33,2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mg

2,24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Glucose

mmol.l

5,11

5,44

7,26

5,11

4,96

7,75

6,73

9,26

5,55

3,64

3,33-5,89

Urea

26

12,8

19,1

21,9

2,9

14,7

16,5

10,7

11,9

25,2

 

Creatinine mmol.l

291

177

293

276

43

272

230

138

112

65

 

Total protein g.l

49,3

48

55,9

52,1

65,4

62,4

 

52,8

60,8

72,8

60-80

Albumin

30,9

 

33,7

32,6

43,9

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lactate

1,64

 

1,68

 

1,39

 

 

 

 

 

 

CRP

0,60

 

 

 

 

61,29

 

 

 

 

Less 0.5

Table 3. Coagulogram in dynamics.

parameter

25.06

27.06

30.06

01.07

Referent norm

APTT sec

20,6

36,2

25,3

22,2

24-36

Thrombin time sec

22,3

 

 

 

8-14

Fibrinogen g.l

1,32

1,04

1,42

2,33

2-4

Prothrombin time sec

14,6

15,5

16,0

16,3

9-16

INR

1,1

1,03

1,08

1,1

0.85-1.23

PT Quick

94

94,4

 

86,3

60-130%

Antithrombin ІІІ

107,6

 

 

 

 

Table 4. Urinalysis in dynamics.

Paremeter

date

26.06

28.06

14.07

16.07

Color

yellow

red

yellow

Light yellow

Clarity

 

 

 

 

Specific gravity

1010

 

1008

1004

рН

6,5

8,0

7,5

8,0

Protein g.l

+++ (3,0)

+++ (3,0)

+++ (3,0)

+++ (3,0)

Glucose

-

+.-

-

-

Ketones

-

-

-

-

Blood

+++ (250 RBC.ul)

+++ (250 RBC.ul)

+++ (250 RBC.ul)

+.- (10 RBC.ul)

RBCs.hpf

60-62

15-17

Fresh 18-20

Little changed 22-24

Fresh 3-4

Little changed 5-6

fresh 0-1

Little changed 4-5

WBCs.hpf

2-3

1-2

2-3

2-3

Squamous epithelial cells.hpf

0-1

0-1

0-1

0-1

Casts

-

-

-

-

Mucus

A little

-

A lot

A little

Crystals

-

-

-

-

Bacteria

-

-

-

-

Table 5. Other lab tests.

Date

Paremeter

Value

Unit of measurement

 

PTH

 

Pg.ml

26.06

РCT

1,90

Ng.ml

 

Anti-HIV

 

 

 

HBsAg, A-Hbc (IgM+IgG) A- HCV (IgM+IgG)

Not found

 

 

Blood group and Rh

 

 

 

DNA – EBV DNA – CMV, HHV-6

 

 

30.06

Coombs test

Negative

 

Microbiological cultures
1. Nose 26.06 and 08.07 – growth of microflora was not detected.
2. Pharynx 26.06 – hemolytic streptococcus; 08.07 – Escherichia coli – III.
3. Blood 08.07 – Staphylococcus epidermidis.
4. Blood (vein) 08.07 - Acinetobacter baumannii, fungi not detected.
5. Blood (catheter)     08.07 - Acinetobacter baumannii, Staphylococcus epidermidis.
6. Blood, subclavian catheter 01.07 - Staphylococcus epidermidis; 09.07 – Staphylococcus epidermidis, no fungi detected.
7. Stomach contents 25.06 – C. Lusitarae.
8. Feces 26.06 – fungi of the genus Candida; 10.07 – pathogenic escherichia, salmonella, and shigella were not detected.
9. Urine 26.06 – C. Lusitarae; 08.07 – BI not detected
10. PD-liquid 08.07 – Acinetobacter baumannii, no fungi detected; 07.19 – microflora growth was not detected. Fungi were not detected.

Table 6. Instrumental examinations.

Examination

Date

Conclusion

Abdominal ultrasound

29.06

Liver: enlarged - right lobe 69 mm, parenchyma homogeneous Gallbladder is anechoic, content is homogeneous

Pancreas: head - 6 mm, body - 3.5 mm, tail - 5.5 mm, uniform, parenchyma of medium echogenicity.

Spleen: not enlarged, parenchyma is homogeneous

Right kidney: typical position, 69x30 mm, increased echogenicity, cortico-medullary differentiation smoothed. Blood flow 1 st.

Left   kidney:   typical   position,   71x31   mm,          increased echogenicity,          cortico-medullary differentiation smoothed. Blood flow 1 st.

Free fluid: interloop minimal effusion. It is dry in the pleural cavities

Echocardiogram

29.06

Heart cavities, valves are not changed. There are no pathological currents. Myocardial

contractility is good. EF - 73%, oval window - 8 mm, there is no effusion in the pericardium.

Neurosonography

29.06

The middle structures are not displaced. СSF spaces are slightly expanded. BA up to 4.5 mm.

The ventricles of the brain are not expanded. Brain parenchyma without focal changes.

Chest X-ray

26.06

The lungs are expanded, pneumatized, without focal, infiltrative changes. The costo-phrenic angles are equal. The contour of the diaphragm is clear and even. The roots are not extended,

they are structural. The shadow of the mediastinum is not displaced, not expanded.

Genetics of the Center

for Disease Control and Prevention

30.06

A: this condition must be differentiated first of all from lysosomal storage disease, as well as from other congenital disorders of the metabolism of amino acids and acylcarnitines.

Dynamic observation in the health care center.

An ophthalmologist, neurologist, hematologist, and surgeon consulted the patient.
The prescribed treatment.
1. Antibacterial. Antimycotic therapy: Zivox, Ceftriaxone, Ceftum.
2. Efferent methods of detoxification: peritoneal dialysis, plasmapheresis, prolonged hemodiafiltration.
3. Infusion therapy and electrolyte solutions: NaCl 0.9%, NaCl 10%, glucose 5%.
4. Hypotensive therapy: Berlinpril, Amlodipine.
5. Blood components: erythrocyte mass, Albumin 20 %, platelet concentrate.
6. Symptomatic therapy.

Clinical diagnosis: Acute intestinal infection. Postdiarrheal hemolytic uremic syndrome. KDIGO-3, oligoanuria stage. Anemia of moderate severity. Mild thrombocytopenia. Dysmetabolic encephalopathy.

Discussion and Review of The Literature.
This clinical case illustrates the typical course of HUS - the presence of the classic triad – microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury [1,7]. This child is at increased risk of developing this disease (children under 5 years old) [3].

Usually, Escherichia coli, which is capable of Shiga toxin production, is the etiological factor in the development of the HUS8. The most common serotype is O157:H7, but there are cases caused by other serotypes, including O111:H8, O103:H2, O121, O145, O26, and O113, as well as other pathogens, such as bacteria of the Shigella spp. and Streptococcus pneumoniae [9,10,11].

Even though Escherichia coli was not isolated from this child during stool culture, this is not an exclusion criterion. From the anamnesis, it is known that an extended period (12 days) passed between the appearance of symptoms of intestinal infection and kidney damage, which proportionally reduces the probability of identifying an ecotropic factor, according to the study of Mody R.K. et al., published in 2012 [12]. The previous administration of antibiotics is also essential.

When the diagnosis of HUS is established, it is essential to determine its clinical form - typical (associated with diarrhea) or atypical (not associated with infection, genetically induced), since the pathogenesis of both types is slightly different. This will help determine the treatment strategy. For a HUS, there is an orthotropic treatment - factor C5 inhibitor Eculizumab, but due to its high cost, it is not very accessible to patients [13].

In the case of the HUS, which is present in this patient, the basis of treatment is supportive therapy. The most critical points are the well-timed start of correction of blood system changes and early liquid resuscitation. However, the approach to infusion therapy must be individual and consider both the degree of renal dysfunction and the total blood volume loss since patients with HUS can be both hypovolemic (due to dehydration) and hypervolemic (due to fluid retention caused by renal dysfunction). In several independent studies (Poland, 2018; Germany, Hamburg, 2016), it has been proven that the early start of infusion contributes to a better prognosis of HUS, but in fluid-overloaded patients, it can cause heart failure, so all infusion solutions and blood products should be administered slowly and under constant monitoring of vital signs [14,15]. When correcting anemia, it is essential to balance the hemoglobin index and the volume of allocated blood components since the consequences of volemic overload for the myocardium are more dangerous than anemia itself. It was also crucial for this patient to start renal replacement therapy as soon as possible—the method of choice - peritoneal dialysis, which is the "gold standard" for children [18].

As for changes in the hemostasis system, both hyper- and hypocoagulation are possible for HUS. Hypercoagulation is more typical for the beginning of the disease, and hypercoagulation – is for the terminal phase due to the consumption of coagulation factors. However, options for the treatment of this syndrome are different. Currently, no advantages of therapy with heparin, streptokinase, or other anticoagulants over adequate supportive therapy have been found [16]. There is a hypocoagulation syndrome in this clinical case, but it was successfully corrected during the treatment with blood components. The duration of thrombocytopenia in this patient was 11 days, which is consistent with other researchers' data regarding the average time of this syndrome in children (13.7 days) [17].

Despite the typical clinical picture of HUS in a patient, diagnosis is still problematic at the primary and secondary level of medical care due to the low frequency of cases in the world (from 0.2 to 3.4 cases per 100,000 children) [3].

Therefore, we have found the necessity for a complex and multidisciplinary approach to managing patients with typical HUS in pediatrics and increasing knowledge about this pathology among general practitioners and district pediatricians.

Conclusions
1. This clinical case is a classic, "textbook" example of hemolytic-uremic syndrome in children, which is indicated by the presence of both a typical anamnesis (a clear connection with a previous infection) and a typical clinical picture ("triad").

2. There is a need to increase knowledge about this pathology among general practitioners and district pediatricians since managing patients with typical HUS in pediatrics requires a complex and multidisciplinary approach.

Author Contributions
S.O. and M.V. were responsible for the diagnostic procedures, clinical diagnosis, and treatment decisions. S.O. 

And O.Y. wrote the manuscript. A.I., I. A was responsible for the data acquisition. S.O., I.A., and O.Y.

They were responsible for collecting and assembling the articles/published data and their inclusion and interpretation. 

In this review. All authors contributed to the critical manuscript revision for valuable intellectual content. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethics Requirements
"The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding this article. " "The authors declare that all the procedures and experiments of this study respect the ethical standards in the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008(5), and the national law. Informed consent was obtained. from the patient included in the study. "No funding for this study. "

Acknowledgements: None

List of abbreviations
HUS- Hemolytic uremic syndrome
AKI-Acute kidney insufficiency
CKD - chronic kidney disease
KDIGO-3- kidney disease: Improving Global Outcomes
APTT- Activated partial Thromboplastin time
INR-international normalized ratio

References

  1. Żurowska A (2012) Zespół hemolityczno-mocznicowy u dzieci i młodzieży. Forum Nefrologiczne. 5(4): 283–288.
  2. Oakes RS, Kirkham JK, Nelson RD, Siegler RL (2008) Duration of oliguria and anuria as predictors of chronic renal-related sequelae in post-diarrheal hemolytic uremic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 23(8): 1303-8.
  3. Burakovskyi M (2013). Hemolityko-uremichnyi syndrome u ditei. Infektsiini khvoroby. (1).
  4. Monet-Didailler C, Godron-Dubrasquet A, Madden I, Delmas Y, Llanas B, et al. (2019) Long-term outcome of diarrhea-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome is poorly related to markers of kidney injury at 1-year follow-up in a population-based cohort. Pediatr Nephrol 34(4): 657–662.
  5. Vaterodt L, Holle J, Hüseman D, Müller D, Thumfart J (2018) Short- and Long-Term Renal Outcome of Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome in Childhood. Front. Pediatr. 6: 220.
  6. Schaefer F, Ardissino G, Ariceta G, Fakhouri F, Scully M, et al. (2018) Clinical and genetic predictors of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome phenotype and outcome, Kidney International. 94(2): 408-418.
  7. Fakhouri F, Zuber J, Frémeaux-Bacchi V, Loirat C (2017) Haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Lancet. 390 (10095): 681-696.
  8. Thomas L (2022) Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Epidemiology. News-Medical.
  9. Banatvala N, Griffin PM, Greene KD, Barrett TJ, Bibb WF, et al. (2001) The United States National Prospective Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Study: Microbiologic, Serologic, Clinical, and Epidemiologic Findings. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 183(7): 1063–70.
  10. Costin M, Cinteza E, Balgradean M (2019) Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome - Case report. Maedica (Bucur). 14(3): 298-300.
  11. Constantinescu AR, Bitzan M, Weiss LS, Christen E, Kaplan BS, et al. (2004) Non-enteropathic hemolytic uremic syndrome: causes and short-term course. Am J Kidney Dis. 43(6): 976-82.
  12. Mody RK, Luna-Gierke RE, Jones TF, Comstock N, Hurd S, Scheftel J, et al. (2012) Infections in Pediatric Postdiarrheal Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: Factors Associated with Identifying Shiga Toxin–Producing Escherichia coli. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 166(10): 902–9.
  13. Przychodzień J, Daniel M, Leszczyńska B, AdamczukD, Cichoń- Kawa K, et al. (2018) Analysis of causes and clinical course of hemolytic-uremic syndrome in children – one center experience. Pediatria Polska - Polish Journal of Paediatrics. 93(1): 35-45.
  14. Ardissino G, Tel F, Possenti I, Testa S, Consonni D, et al. (2016) Early Volume Expansion and Outcomes of Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome. Pediatrics. 137(1).
  15. Cornfield DN (2016) Shifting the Paradigm in Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome. Pediatrics. 137(1): e20153524.
  16. Diekmann L (1980) Streptokinase- und Heparinbehandlung beim hämolytisch-urämischen Syndrom [Treatment of the hemolytic- uremic syndrome with streptokinase and heparin (author's transl)]. Clin Padiatr. 192(5): 430-5.
  17. Vyhovska Ya.I. V 41 Hemorahichni zakhvoriuvannia. Medychna literatura.-Lviv: VAT «Biblos», 1998. – 240 s.
  18. Oakes RS, Kirkham JK, Nelson RD, Siegler RL (2008) Duration of oliguria and anuria as predictors of chronic renal-related sequelae in post-diarrheal hemolytic uremic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 23(8): 1303-8.